Storm over the masked false witnesses who hid ransom of 56 million euros in the Novartis case
There has been an uproar following the revelation by Proto Thema about the payments received by the "protected witnesses" – they made different statements when wearing masks compared to when they testified openly. According to the government spokesman, new facts have emerged, and the judiciary will decide
BBC immediate analysis: how the attack on Trump changes the data on the US elections
This "shocking act of political violence will inevitably have an impact on the campaign", it says - Already Republicans are referring to the attack by linking it directly to the choice Americans must make at the polls in November
Scandal and political turmoil following the revelation that Novartis whistleblowers received €56 million
Since the witnesses had personal gain, as revealed by the current issue of Proto Thema, their anonymity must be removed, and their protected status lifted. The question is, who prompted them to make the allegations that supported the Novartis conspiracy?
