New York Times attempts to map the strategy behind the Islamic State’s (IS) destruction of ancient historical sites in a piece posted by Sarah Almukhtar. On the one hand, the jihadists want to instill fear into the hearts of its enemies, on the other hand they want to impress would-be recruits to its ranks. They do it all for the glory and the money the article argues. Here are some excerpts:
“ISIS Reaps Enormous Propaganda Value From the Attention
The Islamic State has said that the historical objects and sites it destroyed were heresy to its ideology, which is rooted in Wahhabism. In Palmyra, for example, the group blew up two historic tombs, one of a Shiite saint and another of a Sufi scholar, because it considers them to be forms of idolatry.In March, the Islamic State released videos showing its militants shooting at and bulldozing Hatra and Nimrud, ancient sites in northern Iraq. The dramatic footage gained significant media attention, allowing the group to extend its message widely and potentially expand its recruiting. Eleanor Robson, a professor of ancient Middle Eastern history at University College London, wrote, however, that contrary to the common perception generated by the episodes, it was “far from the total destruction” that has been reported.”
“ISIS Profits as Part of a Large Network of Looters
The Islamic State took advantage of “an already thriving trade in looted antiquities” that had been established during years of conflict in Iraq and Syria, wrote Amr al-Azm, a professor of Middle East history and anthropology at Shawnee State University, for the Middle East Institute. Palmyra’s ruins had already been looted for some time before the Islamic State took control, for example.There are thousands of archaeological sites across Iraq and Syria and, although the Islamic State seems to be more efficient at moving antiquities, it is operating within a large, established system of looters.”
Ask me anything
Explore related questions